Le Berkman Center de la Harvard School of Law annonce un partenariat avec CALI (Center for Computer Assisted Legal Instruction), un centre de formation en droit :

Critics of American law schools observe that little has changed in legal education since the days of Christopher Columbus Langdell, the Harvard Law School dean who established the case method over 100 years ago. While this claim exaggerates reality, change can indeed spread slowly in law teaching and scholarship. Yet right now the Internet is opening vast new possibilities for scholarship and teaching that can transform how the next generation of lawyers learn.

To capture these opportunities, the Berkman Center is partnering with CALI (Center for Computer Assisted Legal Instruction) to research and develop new methods of scholarship and teaching that exploit the Internet’s open and collaborative possibilities. CALI is a nonprofit consortium comprising over 200 American and Canadian law schools that has long been a leader in pushing innovation and exploring the intersection between computers and legal education. Berkman, too, has a history of developing teaching tools such as the H2O platform, the online question tool, and Berkman Island in Second Life. The partnership with CALI will provide the latest – and possibly most direct – means for Berkman faculty, fellows, and research to reach almost every law school in the nation.

Le groupe Ithaka, un organisme à but non lucratif des USA qui fait la promotion de l’utilisation efficace des technologies de l’information dans le monde académique, nous livre un rapport qui favorise l’utilisation d’Internet pour diffuser les savoirs produits dans le monde universitaire. Selon le site :

Scholars have a vast range of opportunities to distribute their work, from setting up web pages or blogs, to posting articles to working paper websites or institutional repositories, to including them in peer-reviewed journals or books. In American colleges and universities, access to the internet and World Wide Web is ubiquitous; consequently nearly all intellectual effort results in some form of “publishing”. Yet universities do not treat this function as an important, mission-centric endeavor. The result has been a scholarly publishing industry that many in the university community find to be increasingly out of step with the important values of the academy.

This paper argues that a renewed commitment to publishing in its broadest sense can enable universities to more fully realize the potential global impact of their academic programs, enhance the reputations of their institutions, maintain a strong voice in determining what constitutes important scholarship, and in some cases reduce costs.

Ithaka. 2007. University Publishing in a Digital Age. PDF, 69 p.

L’International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) ainsi que l’International Publishers’ Association (IPA) annoncent la conclusion d’un accord concernant l’utilisation des « œuvres orphelines » – oeuvres dont le détenteur du droit d’auteur est introuvable et qui rend leur utilisation difficile. Selon le communiqué :

The statement sets out five principles to be followed by users of orphaned works:

* A reasonably diligent search should be undertaken to find the copyright owner.

* The user of an orphan work must provide a clear and adequate attribution to the copyright owner.

* If the copyright owner reappears, the owner should be reasonably remunerated or appropriate restitution should be made.

* If injunctive relief is available against the use of a previously orphaned work, the injunctive relief should take into account the creative efforts and investment made in good faith by the user of the work.

* The use of orphan works in non-exclusive.

Claudia Lux (IFLA), co-Chair of the IFLA/IPA Steering Group declared: « Orphan works are bad news for all concerned: for information users, librarians, publishers and authors. Creativity and progress are stifled when so many works are consigned to a legal limbo because their copyright owners cannot be traced. The principles which IFLA has agreed with the IPA are an important step forward because they set out clearly what bona fide users of orphan works must do to avoid being held liable for copyright infringement, and what should be done if a missing copyright owner is found after the work has been used. If applied, the principles would ensure that the rights of copyright owners are respected without exposing users of orphan works to an intimidating level of risk. »

Herman P. Spruijt (IPA), co-Chair of the Steering Group declared: « Copyright is crucially important to publishers. We must ensure that it supports access to knowledge and takes into account the interests of all those contributing to the knowledge economy, including publishers. As part of their business publishers seek authorisation to use previously published works, including orphan works. Publishers will therefore benefit from a pragmatic, common sense approach that balances the legitimate interests of all sides. Our principles will help to achieve this. »

Voir le communiqué de presse ainsi que la déclaration complète concernant les œuvres orphelines.

La Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation lance un appel de candidatures pour un prix célébrant les initiatives offrant un accès libre à l’information et à Internet, particulièrement pour au profit des communautés défavorisées. La valeur du prix. un million de dollars US !

Voici le lien vers la brochure d’information, disponible en français et en PDF.

Democratic Media est un nouveau groupe pancanadien (mais en anglais uniquement) qui offre des services de médiation concernant la réforme de la règlementation des médias. Selon le site,

Canadians for Democratic Media is a national, non-profit, non-partisan media reform network working to increase informed public participation in Canadian media policy formation. We encourage the formation and adoption of policies that will produce a more competitive, diverse, and public-service oriented media system with a strong non-profit and non-commercial sector. Members of our network include civic groups, labour organizations, media advocacy groups, academics, grassroots media activists, and other Canadians.

Leur première initiative consiste à lancer une campagne de médiation concernant le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadienne. D’ailleurs, ils proposent une vidéo dans YouTube :

Un nouveau documentaire concernant le droit d’auteur et la culture est en gestation. Nommé Good Copy Bad Copy, sa bande annonce est actuellement difusée dans Internet.

Voici un nouveau carnet web qui traite de l’accès citoyen aux données gouvernementales, nommé http://datalibre.ca/.

Une collègue nous souligne un site de suggestions de lecture intitulé Pause Lecture. N’est-ce pas merveilleux de voir un recyclage de données au profit d’une autre communauté ou d’un autre usage ?

Voici un site qui propose une nouvelle approche pour l’évaluation de la pertinence de journaux académiques : http://www.eigenfactor.org/. Essentiellement, un des conservateurs du site prétend que l’approche est similaire à celle de Google (voir Bergstrom, Carl, 2007, C&RL News, Vol. 68, No. 5, May 2007, p. 314-316)

Voici le communiqué décrivant les modifications au Code criminel pour mettre fin au piratage des films.

Voici la page du Parlement du Canada concernant le projet de loi C-59: Loi modifiant le Code criminel (enregistrement non autorisé d’un film)